Re Globe SSI Series: “When did providing health insurance to kids with disabilities become a bad thing?”

Two of our close partners, Linda Landry of the Disability Law Center and Sarah Anderson at Greater Boston Legal Services wrote this response to the Boston Globe series on SSI. Here’s their guest post:

When did providing health insurance to kids with disabilities become a bad thing?

After all, the state is just celebrating the recent news that in 2010, 99.8% of Massachusetts children had health insurance coverage. This includes kids with disabilities who receive SSI. This insurance is provided on sliding scale, starting with free coverage for the poorest children and families. Providing access to health care for children makes good public policy sense. Massachusetts has worked for decades to achieve this goal of insuring all children. Access to appropriate health screenings and treatment may prevent the development or worsening of conditions that will later prevent a child from becoming a tax paying adult citizen of the state. It’s easy to discount invisible disabilities like mental health conditions, but these deserve identification and treatment as well. Thanks to advances in medicine, it is increasingly possible to identify and treat some mental health conditions earlier in life, This can help children maximize their potential and mitigate the effect of potentially lifelong disabling conditions in adulthood. The goal is not to label children as disabled, but rather to identify potential barriers to functioning and provide access to appropriate means of addressing the condition. In some cases, this means medication. Indeed, some conditions, like speech problems must be treated early for the best effect to avoid the formation of less effective neurological pathways that may be more difficult and more expensive to treat later.

This week’s Globe series on SSI leaves the impression that it is easy to qualify children for SSI disability benefits and that parents must medicate their children to qualify. Neither of these is true. The SSI program for children requires medical evidence of a diagnosis, but to get benefits a child must show that she is functioning at least 50 – 70% below what is expected of same age children without disabilities in two areas of childhood functioning.

The SSI program does not require children to take medication in order to qualify for benefits. However, the Social Security Administration, SSA, does want to see that children are involved in treatment that is appropriate for the condition and the individual circumstances. This is one way SSA works to prevent applicants from receiving benefits for conditions that, when treated, are not disabling. The Globe series leaves the impression that there is something wrong with providing benefits to children with invisible disabilities like mental health conditions or DHD. But, no diagnosis in and of itself, qualifies as a disability for SSI, without an investigation how the condition affects the child’s ability to function – at home, at school, or with their friends. It’s time to celebrate health care for all kids, not bash the program that makes it possible for kids with disabilities to get the care they need.

Linda Landry, Disability Law Center and
Sarah Anderson, Greater Boston Legal Services

About HCFA

The Ultimate Massachusetts Health Care Insider Information
This entry was posted in Children's Health, Children's Mental Health. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Re Globe SSI Series: “When did providing health insurance to kids with disabilities become a bad thing?”

  1. Ryan says:

    A major theme of the article was pointing out that there are unintended consequences for programs such as SSI.

    When did providing health insurance to kids with disabilities become a bad thing?

    It becomes a bad thing when it ends up destroying a child’s sense of self worth, hampers a child’s ability to develop a work ethic at a young age, or leads to a sense of reliance upon the government to survive.

    I thought the author did a great job of gathering quotations from a variety of different sources which gives insight into the minds of children and families participating in this program instead of your approach of simply throwing out the same tired statistics that our media loves to recycle over and over.

  2. Joe says:

    Great justification for insurance for disabled: ( “With treatment, they will become tax-paying citizens” )

    My parents should have robbed a bank. Wit the money, they could have sent me to an Ivy league school, instead of a State University, and I would have earned a six-figure income, thereby paying more in taxes now).

    Fortunately some judge in Virginia has some brains. Maybe now we’ll repeal health care reform.

  3. ? says:

    As a $10 billion program, are you sure it’s not easy to qualify children for SSI?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s